Israel's actions in Gaza have come under renewed focus as Human Rights Watch (HRW) published a scathing report, which has pointed to the denial of basic resources like clean water for Palestinians.
The report directly labels these actions as acts of genocide, which underscores the mass killing of civilians as a violation of international law. HRW claims that these policies amount to extermination and genocide, as defined by the 1948 Genocide Convention. While proof of intent remains an important part of legal classification, statements made by Israeli officials might suggest the intent to destroy the Palestinian population, thereby strengthening the case for genocide.
This assessment follows similar accusations by Amnesty International, marking the second major rights group to use the term genocide in this context. Israel has repeatedly rejected these accusations, asserting its right to defend itself following the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack, which resulted in over a thousand Israeli deaths and hundreds taken hostage. In response, Israel launched a large-scale air and ground campaign, which has reportedly killed over 45,000 Palestinians, displaced millions, and left much of Gaza in ruins.
The legal ramifications are significant. The International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Israeli leaders over alleged war crimes, including genocide. Israel denies these allegations, maintaining its stance that its actions are necessary for national security.
The blockade on Gaza has crippled essential infrastructure, with water, electricity, and fuel supplies severely restricted. This has led to catastrophic conditions for Palestinians, as the Human Rights Watch report details the extent of the crisis. With genocide now being formally attributed to Israel’s actions, international discussions on accountability and justice are more urgent than ever.
Information is everywhere, yet too often, it doesn’t lead to action. We have the tools to see the truth, but the stories we hear are shaped by the powerful, not the vulnerable. Technology should inform, but it too often distorts, clouding the human cost of conflicts.
Powerful nations and digital platforms decide what we focus on, leaving lives, dignity, and morality on the sidelines. The real question is what we choose to do next. When knowledge is within reach, inaction becomes a choice. And that choice — more than anything — defines us.
Top featured image: Dixit Dhinakaran / Unsplash
Read next: Supreme Court Steps In as TikTok Challenges U.S. Sale Order Deadline
Top featured image: Dixit Dhinakaran / Unsplash
Read next: Supreme Court Steps In as TikTok Challenges U.S. Sale Order Deadline
