Meta’s Threads experiment for more fediverse sharing seems to be going strong.
The platform has just taken a few more steps in the fediverse sharing realm this week. This includes enabling both likes and replies on Threads from other servers.
For those who might not be aware, one of the core features of Meta’s Threads trial was fediverse sharing and since then, we’ve been seeing the team work hard to facilitate different platforms that enable this. Anyone using its ActivityPub protocol can combine content from the app and also host with time.
Let’s explain with a simple example. If you publish a post on Threads and have fediverse sharing activated, the post is shared on other platforms that make use of ActivityPub.
If that app was Mastodon, you can see comments that others make on that app through Threads and vice versa. How’s that for a cool collaboration initiative?
The fediverse got its name due to the amalgamation of thousands of independent working servers. They work in tandem and give rise to new types of social media presence. The main concept here is linked to less control and no single app dominating or gathering users’ data. Every case gives rise to its guidelines, systems, and algorithm.
If you really come to think of it, the concept allows for division on social media so no one can take advantage of others. You can align your favorites, interests, and rules as per your liking. As per some critics, it’s a nerdy concept while others feel it gives empowerment over your social media journey.
It’s not an easy concept to grasp, considering how limited time and patience people have in today’s time. They just want to download apps, make profiles, and use them. Nobody thinks about specific details or getting into complexities but Meta wants to change that.
Meta is clearly showing its desire to be known for the fediverse concept. The goal is simple, reinforcing the market position if it chooses to be a bigger element. The concept is all about communication without any costs. If you ask us, it’s a little controversial but when is Meta not?
Threads has expanded to a bigger and better network with more fediverse sharing offerings. Whether or not it turns into a major consideration for the world, only time can tell.
Image: DIW-Aigen
Read next: Google Under Fire Again For Displaying Gun-Related Videos To Minors On YouTube
The platform has just taken a few more steps in the fediverse sharing realm this week. This includes enabling both likes and replies on Threads from other servers.
For those who might not be aware, one of the core features of Meta’s Threads trial was fediverse sharing and since then, we’ve been seeing the team work hard to facilitate different platforms that enable this. Anyone using its ActivityPub protocol can combine content from the app and also host with time.
Let’s explain with a simple example. If you publish a post on Threads and have fediverse sharing activated, the post is shared on other platforms that make use of ActivityPub.
If that app was Mastodon, you can see comments that others make on that app through Threads and vice versa. How’s that for a cool collaboration initiative?
The fediverse got its name due to the amalgamation of thousands of independent working servers. They work in tandem and give rise to new types of social media presence. The main concept here is linked to less control and no single app dominating or gathering users’ data. Every case gives rise to its guidelines, systems, and algorithm.
If you really come to think of it, the concept allows for division on social media so no one can take advantage of others. You can align your favorites, interests, and rules as per your liking. As per some critics, it’s a nerdy concept while others feel it gives empowerment over your social media journey.
It’s not an easy concept to grasp, considering how limited time and patience people have in today’s time. They just want to download apps, make profiles, and use them. Nobody thinks about specific details or getting into complexities but Meta wants to change that.
Meta is clearly showing its desire to be known for the fediverse concept. The goal is simple, reinforcing the market position if it chooses to be a bigger element. The concept is all about communication without any costs. If you ask us, it’s a little controversial but when is Meta not?
Threads has expanded to a bigger and better network with more fediverse sharing offerings. Whether or not it turns into a major consideration for the world, only time can tell.
Read next: Google Under Fire Again For Displaying Gun-Related Videos To Minors On YouTube
