The Supreme Court is gearing up to hear arguments regarding new state laws that wish to gain more control over what leading social media apps display.
This includes the kind of obligations that leading tech giants hold for content being published. And as one can expect, this would have some serious impacts across the online world.
The judges would start hearing the arguments as early as next month when many states are coming up with their own laws to stringently regulate apps like X, Facebook, and YouTube.
While the court did agree to hear these cases as early as last year in September, it never happened. And that’s why it’s now taking center stage with a confirmed date set to be February end, 2024.
The laws will force apps to do several things which include disclosing reasons for what kind of content moderation decisions have been taken so far regarding online posts.
Meanwhile, the news of these arguments all began when states like Texas and Florida rolled out laws to restrict conservative censorship across big apps. So they want explanations for how they are regulating content.
As it is, Florida is going to get rid of some currently placed civil liability protections and that means seeing platforms increasing fines for deplatforming leading candidates in the world of politics.
But the laws were not welcomed with open arms. Two big tech advocacy firms including NetChoice claim that they were against the country’s First Amendment. Meanwhile, the 11th Circuit stopped the state of Florida from bringing the law into effect. However, the 5th Circuit nixed one other lower court against the law arising in Texas.
Therefore, it’s now going to be very interesting in terms of what the judges of the Supreme Court rule in this regard. Will they enable states to allow principles of free speech to be obscured or will they actually give rise to a decision that is under the First Amendment?
This means we could see if apps are forced to give users greater figures of individual explanations as to why a certain post of theirs had to be removed from the app.
So many leading social media giants continue to argue that the decision might be taken in favor of the American states and that could have some serious implications in terms of reshaping and degrading a whole list of famous websites that emphasize content produced by users.
And without such types of editorial choices and websites, we’re going to see experiences that get bombarded with spam, bullying, and other kinds of harmful content in the online world.
This was a part of the argument that the tech advocacy groups have put forward. And in case you’re wondering, they include members like Facebook’s parent firm Meta and Elon Musk’s X Corp.
Photo: Digital Information World - AIgen
Read next: EU Lawmakers Pressurized To Be More Transparent About Child Tech Policymaking
This includes the kind of obligations that leading tech giants hold for content being published. And as one can expect, this would have some serious impacts across the online world.
The judges would start hearing the arguments as early as next month when many states are coming up with their own laws to stringently regulate apps like X, Facebook, and YouTube.
While the court did agree to hear these cases as early as last year in September, it never happened. And that’s why it’s now taking center stage with a confirmed date set to be February end, 2024.
The laws will force apps to do several things which include disclosing reasons for what kind of content moderation decisions have been taken so far regarding online posts.
Meanwhile, the news of these arguments all began when states like Texas and Florida rolled out laws to restrict conservative censorship across big apps. So they want explanations for how they are regulating content.
As it is, Florida is going to get rid of some currently placed civil liability protections and that means seeing platforms increasing fines for deplatforming leading candidates in the world of politics.
But the laws were not welcomed with open arms. Two big tech advocacy firms including NetChoice claim that they were against the country’s First Amendment. Meanwhile, the 11th Circuit stopped the state of Florida from bringing the law into effect. However, the 5th Circuit nixed one other lower court against the law arising in Texas.
Therefore, it’s now going to be very interesting in terms of what the judges of the Supreme Court rule in this regard. Will they enable states to allow principles of free speech to be obscured or will they actually give rise to a decision that is under the First Amendment?
This means we could see if apps are forced to give users greater figures of individual explanations as to why a certain post of theirs had to be removed from the app.
So many leading social media giants continue to argue that the decision might be taken in favor of the American states and that could have some serious implications in terms of reshaping and degrading a whole list of famous websites that emphasize content produced by users.
And without such types of editorial choices and websites, we’re going to see experiences that get bombarded with spam, bullying, and other kinds of harmful content in the online world.
This was a part of the argument that the tech advocacy groups have put forward. And in case you’re wondering, they include members like Facebook’s parent firm Meta and Elon Musk’s X Corp.
Read next: EU Lawmakers Pressurized To Be More Transparent About Child Tech Policymaking
