The story of Apple’s lawsuit against the NSO Group, which is the name of the organization that created the notorious Pegasus spyware, has just seen its first victory in favor of the tech juggernaut. The group had been trying to get the lawsuit brought to Israel, its home country, but in spite of the fact that this is the case, a judge refused to dismiss the lawsuit, which makes it so that the legal proceedings will occur on Apple’s turf with all things having been considered and taken into account.
According to the statement put out by Judge Donato, Apple will end up experiencing similar challenges to the NSO Group if the lawsuit was sent to the Israeli justice system, and the overall burden will be more or less the same. With all of that having been said and now out of the way, it is important to note that witnesses and evidence are going to be equally available regardless of the country in which the case is tried, and NSO wasn’t able to provide any reasonable factors that would make an American trial seem unfair to them.
NSO also tried to say that Apple doesn’t have sufficient grounds for a lawsuit, but Donato pointed to both the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act as well as the Unfair Competition Law in California to show that the case does have merits. As a result, the motion to dismiss was denied outright, and NSO will need to respond to the complaint by February 14th, 2024 at the latest.
This is a win for Apple because of the fact that this is the sort of thing that could potentially end up validating its claims, and Donato’s clear displeasure at NSO’s attempts to escape justice are essential to bear in mind. Apple is continuing to fight against these so-called 21st century mercenary groups through features like Lockdown Mode, along with sending users a notification in the event that state actors try to gain access to their devices. The results of this case will have widespread implications for the industry in general.
Photo: Digital Information World - AIgen
Read next: IEA Projects Data Center Electricity Needs to Exceed 1,000 Twh by 2026, Raising Environmental Concerns
According to the statement put out by Judge Donato, Apple will end up experiencing similar challenges to the NSO Group if the lawsuit was sent to the Israeli justice system, and the overall burden will be more or less the same. With all of that having been said and now out of the way, it is important to note that witnesses and evidence are going to be equally available regardless of the country in which the case is tried, and NSO wasn’t able to provide any reasonable factors that would make an American trial seem unfair to them.
NSO also tried to say that Apple doesn’t have sufficient grounds for a lawsuit, but Donato pointed to both the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act as well as the Unfair Competition Law in California to show that the case does have merits. As a result, the motion to dismiss was denied outright, and NSO will need to respond to the complaint by February 14th, 2024 at the latest.
This is a win for Apple because of the fact that this is the sort of thing that could potentially end up validating its claims, and Donato’s clear displeasure at NSO’s attempts to escape justice are essential to bear in mind. Apple is continuing to fight against these so-called 21st century mercenary groups through features like Lockdown Mode, along with sending users a notification in the event that state actors try to gain access to their devices. The results of this case will have widespread implications for the industry in general.
Read next: IEA Projects Data Center Electricity Needs to Exceed 1,000 Twh by 2026, Raising Environmental Concerns
