In a world where artificial intelligence continues to push the boundaries of what's possible, the recent innovations from Google is raising eyebrows and causing waves in the media industry. With AI-driven technology that can summarize web content on demand, Google is once again redefining the way we access information.
Google's foray into this new realm of generative AI, aptly named the Search Generative Experience (SGE), is a game-changer. It's like having your own personal news curator, providing you with tailored summaries at your fingertips. Since its inception in May 2023, SGE has taken center stage in the battle for information supremacy, challenging Google's standing as the go-to source for information, particularly in light of the rise of OpenAI's ChatGPT, which is also powering the Microsoft Bing.
So, what exactly does SGE bring to the table? Picture this: you enter a search query, and SGE generates a concise summary in response. These summaries are strategically placed atop the Google search homepage, accompanied by tantalizing links inviting you to explore further. It's an evolving experiment by Google, designed to gather user feedback and enhance the product. Yet, it's the invisible battle behind the scenes that's sparking intrigue.
For publishers, SEOs, webmasters and bloggers, the rise of SGE presents both an opportunity and a conundrum. If they opt to block their content from being used in SGE summaries, they also risk fading into obscurity on the web, affecting their web traffic and visibility. This decision isn't to be taken lightly, as the world grapples with the potential dominance of AI in information access.
The concerns of publishers are multifaceted. They question the impact on web traffic, the attribution of their content in SGE summaries, and the accuracy of these summaries. However, the most significant point of contention revolves around compensation. Publishers desire fair recompense for the content that powers Google's AI, a matter that remains contentious in the AI landscape.
Google's response? They claim to prioritize driving valuable traffic to a diverse array of content creators, including news publishers and blogs. Compensation remains a subject open to discussion, with Google seeking input from publishers and other stakeholders.
To address some of these concerns, Google unveiled Google-Extended in late September. This tool allows publishers to block their content from being used in training Google's AI models. It's a goodwill gesture, an attempt to foster a healthier exchange between publishers and AI. However, the big question remains - will compensation follow suit?
For publishers, visibility is paramount. Showing up in Google search results is crucial for securing advertisers. However, SGE's design relegates traditional search links further down the page, potentially reducing traffic to those links by up to 40%, as reported by Helen Coster on Reuters. There's even the comical possibility that users may find their information fix in the SGE summaries, skipping the links altogether, much to the dismay of publishers.
While SGE might dent organic traffic, it's unlikely to tarnish publishers' reputations. Having their links featured in SGE summaries can be a badge of honor, a mark of their credibility.
As the tussle between publishers and AI continues, one thing remains clear: the landscape is evolving rapidly. Publishers, who spent decades optimizing their websites for traditional Google search, find themselves in uncharted territory with SGE. The inner workings of this AI section are shrouded in mystery, and publishers are left grappling with how to ensure their content finds a place in this new algorithm.
At its core, the publisher's concern is that Google is crawling their content to generate summaries that users read instead of clicking on their links, all without clear guidance on how to block their content from SGE.
In this evolving landscape, websites are increasingly choosing to block their content from AI use. Recent data from AI content detector OriginalityAI reveals that, since its release, 26 percent of top websites are blocking ChatGPT's bot. This includes influential platforms like NYTimes, TheVerge and ScienceDirect. In comparison, only 6 percent are blocking Google-Extended bot.
In a world where AI is redefining how we access information, the battle for prominence and revenue in this new era rages on. It's a digital Wild West, where publishers, AI, and tech giants like Google are vying for their piece of the pie.
Photo: DIW
Read next: AI Technology May Be Growing Rapidly But It Fails To Provide Adequate Transparency, New Study Proves
Google's foray into this new realm of generative AI, aptly named the Search Generative Experience (SGE), is a game-changer. It's like having your own personal news curator, providing you with tailored summaries at your fingertips. Since its inception in May 2023, SGE has taken center stage in the battle for information supremacy, challenging Google's standing as the go-to source for information, particularly in light of the rise of OpenAI's ChatGPT, which is also powering the Microsoft Bing.
So, what exactly does SGE bring to the table? Picture this: you enter a search query, and SGE generates a concise summary in response. These summaries are strategically placed atop the Google search homepage, accompanied by tantalizing links inviting you to explore further. It's an evolving experiment by Google, designed to gather user feedback and enhance the product. Yet, it's the invisible battle behind the scenes that's sparking intrigue.
For publishers, SEOs, webmasters and bloggers, the rise of SGE presents both an opportunity and a conundrum. If they opt to block their content from being used in SGE summaries, they also risk fading into obscurity on the web, affecting their web traffic and visibility. This decision isn't to be taken lightly, as the world grapples with the potential dominance of AI in information access.
The concerns of publishers are multifaceted. They question the impact on web traffic, the attribution of their content in SGE summaries, and the accuracy of these summaries. However, the most significant point of contention revolves around compensation. Publishers desire fair recompense for the content that powers Google's AI, a matter that remains contentious in the AI landscape.
Google's response? They claim to prioritize driving valuable traffic to a diverse array of content creators, including news publishers and blogs. Compensation remains a subject open to discussion, with Google seeking input from publishers and other stakeholders.
To address some of these concerns, Google unveiled Google-Extended in late September. This tool allows publishers to block their content from being used in training Google's AI models. It's a goodwill gesture, an attempt to foster a healthier exchange between publishers and AI. However, the big question remains - will compensation follow suit?
For publishers, visibility is paramount. Showing up in Google search results is crucial for securing advertisers. However, SGE's design relegates traditional search links further down the page, potentially reducing traffic to those links by up to 40%, as reported by Helen Coster on Reuters. There's even the comical possibility that users may find their information fix in the SGE summaries, skipping the links altogether, much to the dismay of publishers.
While SGE might dent organic traffic, it's unlikely to tarnish publishers' reputations. Having their links featured in SGE summaries can be a badge of honor, a mark of their credibility.
As the tussle between publishers and AI continues, one thing remains clear: the landscape is evolving rapidly. Publishers, who spent decades optimizing their websites for traditional Google search, find themselves in uncharted territory with SGE. The inner workings of this AI section are shrouded in mystery, and publishers are left grappling with how to ensure their content finds a place in this new algorithm.
At its core, the publisher's concern is that Google is crawling their content to generate summaries that users read instead of clicking on their links, all without clear guidance on how to block their content from SGE.
In this evolving landscape, websites are increasingly choosing to block their content from AI use. Recent data from AI content detector OriginalityAI reveals that, since its release, 26 percent of top websites are blocking ChatGPT's bot. This includes influential platforms like NYTimes, TheVerge and ScienceDirect. In comparison, only 6 percent are blocking Google-Extended bot.
In a world where AI is redefining how we access information, the battle for prominence and revenue in this new era rages on. It's a digital Wild West, where publishers, AI, and tech giants like Google are vying for their piece of the pie.
Read next: AI Technology May Be Growing Rapidly But It Fails To Provide Adequate Transparency, New Study Proves
