Recent EU rules are beginning to impact the digital world, notably on prominent tech players like Instagram and TikTok. These rules are based on the EU Digital Services Act (DSA) and are intended to ensure user safety and security across diverse online platforms.
The DSA imposes a higher level of accountability, with severe consequences for individuals who do not comply. A collection of nineteen significant technology platforms, including giants like Facebook and TikTok, are now subject to stringent regulations. These include tactics for protecting children and preventing potential intervention in political processes.
It is worth noting that these restrictions extend their reach beyond the borders of the EU, affecting users in the United Kingdom as well. While the UK Online Safety Bill is being debated in Parliament, the EU's Digital Services Act has already become enforceable law as of November 16, 2022. These businesses, however, were allowed a grace period to integrate their systems with the new regulations.
On April 25, the European Commission published a list of critical online platforms with more than 45 million EU users that will be subject to the most onerous rules. This restricted group includes names like AliExpress, Alibaba, Google Play, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Snapchat, and YouTube, among others. Notably, well-known search engines like Bing and Google are not exempt from these rules.
The deadline for compliance with the regulations was set at four months. On the other hand, smaller tech companies have been given an extension, with compliance deadlines stretching into the following year.
Falling afoul of these regulations could lead to severe consequences, potentially resulting in fines of up to 6% of their annual turnover and, in extreme cases, suspending their services.
The DSA imposes special obligations on these significant platforms and search engines besides the baseline ones. They are now obligated to assess potential hazards posed by their operations, report on these assessments, and execute effective remedies. These risk domains include several aspects:
Illegal Content: Ensure that no unlawful content enters the platform.
Rights and Freedoms: Protecting fundamental concepts such as free expression, media freedom, and minorities' rights.
Threats to Public Safety and Electoral Processes: Addressing threats to public safety and electoral processes.
Well-beingWell-being and Protection: Addressing concerns with public health, children's safety, and overall mental and physical well-being well-being.
Gender-Based Violence: Defending against gender-based violence and prejudice.
Furthermore, these rules herald a paradigm shift in advertising techniques.
Personalized advertising based on profiling children is now prohibited. In the pursuit of transparency, these companies must disclose their algorithms' inner workings to regulatory bodies. This encompasses algorithms influencing users' ad experiences and content presentation on their feeds. Furthermore, these entities must establish mechanisms for sharing data with independent researchers.
Prominent organizations are eager to emphasize their commitment to complying with these new laws. TikTok and Meta (previously Facebook) underline that over a thousand people inside their organizations have been dedicated to guaranteeing DSA compliance.
Several businesses have already begun to adopt adjustments, particularly in the areas of tailored marketing and user feeds:
Since July, TikTok has stopped delivering targeted adverts based on the online activity of users aged 13-17 in Europe.
Meta apps: Since February, Facebook and Instagram have stopped serving advertising based on user activity for individuals aged 13 to 17.
Facebook and Instagram: Users in Europe can now only see Stories and Reels from people they follow in chronological order.
Snapchat limits tailored ads to users aged 13-17 in the UK and Europe while building a library of ads displayed within the EU.
However, despite the BBC's request, some corporations have yet to share specifics regarding adjustments implemented. X, formerly known as Twitter, has demonstrated progress toward achieving regulatory requirements while making no specific changes.
Legal wranglings have also erupted as retail behemoths Amazon and Zalando disputed their classification as large online platforms. Amazon claims it is not the largest retailer in any of the EU countries it operates. Regardless, Amazon has proactively complied with the act's standards. This involves establishing a reporting system for suspected illicit products and content. Zalando, too, declares its dedication to compliance.
In reaction to the DSA, several changes have been made to Wikipedia. Nonetheless, the project's foundation argues that these adjustments should have little influence on users' daily lives. The foundation contends that the DSA's regulatory approach is preferable to the UK's internet safety bill. Notably, the foundation claims that specific provisions in UK legislation may pose compliance issues.
Phil Bradley-Schmieg, legal counsel at the Wikimedia Foundation, hopes that legislatures will follow the DSA's lead. He emphasizes the significance of understanding the complex internet ecology and preserving the area of safe, accessible, and publicly available online initiatives.
Finally, the digital world is changing due to the new EU legislation. Significant platforms and search engines are recalibrating their operations to comply with the Digital Services Act's strict provisions. This move can potentially create a more secure and transparent online environment.
Read next: Navigating the Shift as Publishers Witness Dip in X (Twitter) Referral Traffic
The DSA imposes a higher level of accountability, with severe consequences for individuals who do not comply. A collection of nineteen significant technology platforms, including giants like Facebook and TikTok, are now subject to stringent regulations. These include tactics for protecting children and preventing potential intervention in political processes.
It is worth noting that these restrictions extend their reach beyond the borders of the EU, affecting users in the United Kingdom as well. While the UK Online Safety Bill is being debated in Parliament, the EU's Digital Services Act has already become enforceable law as of November 16, 2022. These businesses, however, were allowed a grace period to integrate their systems with the new regulations.
On April 25, the European Commission published a list of critical online platforms with more than 45 million EU users that will be subject to the most onerous rules. This restricted group includes names like AliExpress, Alibaba, Google Play, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Snapchat, and YouTube, among others. Notably, well-known search engines like Bing and Google are not exempt from these rules.
The deadline for compliance with the regulations was set at four months. On the other hand, smaller tech companies have been given an extension, with compliance deadlines stretching into the following year.
Falling afoul of these regulations could lead to severe consequences, potentially resulting in fines of up to 6% of their annual turnover and, in extreme cases, suspending their services.
The DSA imposes special obligations on these significant platforms and search engines besides the baseline ones. They are now obligated to assess potential hazards posed by their operations, report on these assessments, and execute effective remedies. These risk domains include several aspects:
Illegal Content: Ensure that no unlawful content enters the platform.
Rights and Freedoms: Protecting fundamental concepts such as free expression, media freedom, and minorities' rights.
Threats to Public Safety and Electoral Processes: Addressing threats to public safety and electoral processes.
Well-beingWell-being and Protection: Addressing concerns with public health, children's safety, and overall mental and physical well-being well-being.
Gender-Based Violence: Defending against gender-based violence and prejudice.
Furthermore, these rules herald a paradigm shift in advertising techniques.
Personalized advertising based on profiling children is now prohibited. In the pursuit of transparency, these companies must disclose their algorithms' inner workings to regulatory bodies. This encompasses algorithms influencing users' ad experiences and content presentation on their feeds. Furthermore, these entities must establish mechanisms for sharing data with independent researchers.
Prominent organizations are eager to emphasize their commitment to complying with these new laws. TikTok and Meta (previously Facebook) underline that over a thousand people inside their organizations have been dedicated to guaranteeing DSA compliance.
Several businesses have already begun to adopt adjustments, particularly in the areas of tailored marketing and user feeds:
Since July, TikTok has stopped delivering targeted adverts based on the online activity of users aged 13-17 in Europe.
Meta apps: Since February, Facebook and Instagram have stopped serving advertising based on user activity for individuals aged 13 to 17.
Facebook and Instagram: Users in Europe can now only see Stories and Reels from people they follow in chronological order.
Snapchat limits tailored ads to users aged 13-17 in the UK and Europe while building a library of ads displayed within the EU.
However, despite the BBC's request, some corporations have yet to share specifics regarding adjustments implemented. X, formerly known as Twitter, has demonstrated progress toward achieving regulatory requirements while making no specific changes.
Legal wranglings have also erupted as retail behemoths Amazon and Zalando disputed their classification as large online platforms. Amazon claims it is not the largest retailer in any of the EU countries it operates. Regardless, Amazon has proactively complied with the act's standards. This involves establishing a reporting system for suspected illicit products and content. Zalando, too, declares its dedication to compliance.
In reaction to the DSA, several changes have been made to Wikipedia. Nonetheless, the project's foundation argues that these adjustments should have little influence on users' daily lives. The foundation contends that the DSA's regulatory approach is preferable to the UK's internet safety bill. Notably, the foundation claims that specific provisions in UK legislation may pose compliance issues.
Phil Bradley-Schmieg, legal counsel at the Wikimedia Foundation, hopes that legislatures will follow the DSA's lead. He emphasizes the significance of understanding the complex internet ecology and preserving the area of safe, accessible, and publicly available online initiatives.
Finally, the digital world is changing due to the new EU legislation. Significant platforms and search engines are recalibrating their operations to comply with the Digital Services Act's strict provisions. This move can potentially create a more secure and transparent online environment.
Read next: Navigating the Shift as Publishers Witness Dip in X (Twitter) Referral Traffic
