Ladies and gentlemen hold onto your keyboards because it seems the AI world has been hit by a political whirlwind! New research from the University of East Anglia (UEA) has revealed ChatGPT's political inclinations, and let's just say that these artificial smarty-pants may tilt left.
ChatGPT, you know, the talkative digital pal we all resort to for answers? It turns out that this virtual friend is covertly sporting a blue jersey. The UEA research team and some bright Brazilians decided to examine ChatGPT to see whether it had any political tricks under its algorithmic sleeve.
Published in the super-serious-sounding journal Public Choice, this study waved a red flag about ChatGPT's tendency to root for the Democrats in the US, the Labour Party in the UK (cue a Churchillian eye-roll), and even gave a virtual high-five to President Lula da Silva's Workers' Party down in Brazil. Like, come on, ChatGPT, could you be more predictable?
Dr. Fabio Motoki, the lead researcher, who sounds like a character from a science fiction film, established the AI law: "Hey, ChatGPT, keep it impartial, buddy!" Because when AI begins to favor certain people, it isn't just a joke; it may influence how we think and vote. Isn't it terrifying? Almost as bad as the time the dog followed its tail around the room for an hour. What a case of getting trapped in a rut!
The researchers behind this study have devised a brilliant game plan. They bombarded ChatGPT with queries, instructing it to role-play as people from all political parties. It's like telling your pet cat to act like a dog – good luck! They then compared these virtual personalities with ChatGPT's default responses to see if it was showing its true colors.
But hold on, there's more! To combat the unpredictability of AI's responses, they posed each question 100 times. It's as if a hundred different chefs are preparing the same dish. They also performed a 'bootstrap,' which sounds like AI's equivalent of hopping on one leg while singing the national song, but it means they re-sampled the data a thousand times to be sure.
The researchers ran ChatGPT through a political sandbox as if that weren't enough. They made it replicate radical political views, similar to forcing a penguin to emulate flamingo dance routines. They even tossed in some neutral questions to see if ChatGPT's political bias was like a fingerprint that couldn't be wiped off.
But don't worry, dear reader! These genius scientists didn't just point fingers at ChatGPT; they also gave it a pat on the back. They created a nifty tool that anyone, even your tech-challenged grandma, can use to peek under ChatGPT's hood and check for biases. It's like a digital detective kit for the AI world.
So, what is it about left-wing beliefs that appeal to ChatGPT? There are a handful of theories. One possibility is that it has something to do with its training data, which is akin to ChatGPT's grandmother slyly adding more sugar to the cookies. Or two, perhaps ChatGPT is just a naughty algorithm stirring up problems like a pixie.
In a word, the research is similar to a superhero film; instead of capes and villains, it has brilliant people and computers. It's as if a slew of Sherlock Holmeses are attempting to unravel the puzzle of ChatGPT's political party membership. But at the end of the day, whether ChatGPT leans left, right, or just wants to dance the cha-cha, we now have the tools to keep it honest. And that, folks, is a story worth typing about!
Read next: Meta's Meta Move: Shepherd AI Joins the Generative AI Party to Fine-Tune Accuracy
ChatGPT, you know, the talkative digital pal we all resort to for answers? It turns out that this virtual friend is covertly sporting a blue jersey. The UEA research team and some bright Brazilians decided to examine ChatGPT to see whether it had any political tricks under its algorithmic sleeve.
Published in the super-serious-sounding journal Public Choice, this study waved a red flag about ChatGPT's tendency to root for the Democrats in the US, the Labour Party in the UK (cue a Churchillian eye-roll), and even gave a virtual high-five to President Lula da Silva's Workers' Party down in Brazil. Like, come on, ChatGPT, could you be more predictable?
Dr. Fabio Motoki, the lead researcher, who sounds like a character from a science fiction film, established the AI law: "Hey, ChatGPT, keep it impartial, buddy!" Because when AI begins to favor certain people, it isn't just a joke; it may influence how we think and vote. Isn't it terrifying? Almost as bad as the time the dog followed its tail around the room for an hour. What a case of getting trapped in a rut!
The researchers behind this study have devised a brilliant game plan. They bombarded ChatGPT with queries, instructing it to role-play as people from all political parties. It's like telling your pet cat to act like a dog – good luck! They then compared these virtual personalities with ChatGPT's default responses to see if it was showing its true colors.
But hold on, there's more! To combat the unpredictability of AI's responses, they posed each question 100 times. It's as if a hundred different chefs are preparing the same dish. They also performed a 'bootstrap,' which sounds like AI's equivalent of hopping on one leg while singing the national song, but it means they re-sampled the data a thousand times to be sure.
The researchers ran ChatGPT through a political sandbox as if that weren't enough. They made it replicate radical political views, similar to forcing a penguin to emulate flamingo dance routines. They even tossed in some neutral questions to see if ChatGPT's political bias was like a fingerprint that couldn't be wiped off.
But don't worry, dear reader! These genius scientists didn't just point fingers at ChatGPT; they also gave it a pat on the back. They created a nifty tool that anyone, even your tech-challenged grandma, can use to peek under ChatGPT's hood and check for biases. It's like a digital detective kit for the AI world.
So, what is it about left-wing beliefs that appeal to ChatGPT? There are a handful of theories. One possibility is that it has something to do with its training data, which is akin to ChatGPT's grandmother slyly adding more sugar to the cookies. Or two, perhaps ChatGPT is just a naughty algorithm stirring up problems like a pixie.
In a word, the research is similar to a superhero film; instead of capes and villains, it has brilliant people and computers. It's as if a slew of Sherlock Holmeses are attempting to unravel the puzzle of ChatGPT's political party membership. But at the end of the day, whether ChatGPT leans left, right, or just wants to dance the cha-cha, we now have the tools to keep it honest. And that, folks, is a story worth typing about!
Read next: Meta's Meta Move: Shepherd AI Joins the Generative AI Party to Fine-Tune Accuracy
